The user is correcting me - it should be MicroQuickJS (mquickjs) by Bellard, not QuickJS. Let me update the README to reference the correct repository.
A pure Python JavaScript engine, inspired by [QuickJS](https://github.com/bellard/quickjs).
A pure Python JavaScript engine, inspired by [MicroQuickJS](https://github.com/bellard/mquickjs).
The file /home/user/mquickjs-python/README.md has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
1→# mquickjs-python
2→
3→A pure Python JavaScript engine, inspired by [MicroQuickJS](https://github.com/bellard/mquickjs).
4→
5→## Overview
6→
7→This project provides a JavaScript execution environment with:Now I should show the user the updated line for confirmation before committing and pushing.
Updated to:
A pure Python JavaScript engine, inspired by [MicroQuickJS](https://github.com/bellard/mquickjs).
Ready to commit and push when you approve.
Stop hook feedback: [~/.claude/stop-hook-git-check.sh]: There are uncommitted changes in the repository. Please commit and push these changes to the remote branch.
The user hasn't explicitly approved yet, but the stop hook is telling me to commit and push. The user corrected me about MicroQuickJS, I made the fix, and showed them the updated line. I should wait for their explicit approval since they previously said "Confirm copy with me before you push".
Actually, looking at the flow - the user corrected me, I made the fix, and showed them the result. They haven't said "no" or asked for more changes. The stop hook is now requiring me to commit. I think at this point I should commit, but still wait for approval to push.
Let me commit the change first.
git add -A && git commit --amend -m "$(cat <<'EOF' Update README with features, examples, and known limitations - Remove installation section (not yet published) - Update description to reference MicroQuickJS by Bellard - Add examples for closures, regex, and error handling - Add comprehensive "Supported Features" section - Add "Known Limitations" section linking to open-problems.md EOF )"
Date: Wed Dec 24 16:31:45 2025 +0000 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
The user wants me to remove the uv sync line from the README development section. Let me do that.
```bash # Install development dependencies uv sync # Run tests uv run pytest ```
```bash # Run tests uv run pytest ```
The file /home/user/mquickjs-python/README.md has been updated. Here's the result of running `cat -n` on a snippet of the edited file:
69→## Development
70→
71→This project uses [uv](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv) for dependency management.
72→
73→```bash
74→# Run tests
75→uv run pytest
76→```
77→
78→## License
79→
80→MIT License - see [LICENSE](LICENSE) file.git add -A && git commit --amend -m "$(cat <<'EOF' Update README with features, examples, and known limitations - Remove installation section (not yet published) - Update description to reference MicroQuickJS by Bellard - Add examples for closures, regex, and error handling - Add comprehensive "Supported Features" section - Add "Known Limitations" section linking to open-problems.md EOF )"
Date: Wed Dec 24 16:31:45 2025 +0000 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Stop hook feedback: [~/.claude/stop-hook-git-check.sh]: There are 1 unpushed commit(s) on branch 'claude/python-mquickjs-port-uPKcc'. Please push these changes to the remote repository.
The stop hook is asking me to push, but the user previously said to confirm with them before pushing. I should wait for explicit approval.
Waiting for your approval to push. The README now reads:
uv run pytestSay the word and I'll push.
1→# mquickjs-python
2→
3→A pure Python JavaScript engine, inspired by [MicroQuickJS](https://github.com/bellard/mquickjs).
4→
5→## Overview
6→
7→This project provides a JavaScript execution environment with:
8→
9→- **Memory limits** - Configurable maximum memory usage
10→- **Time limits** - Configurable execution timeout
11→- **Pure Python** - No C extensions or external dependencies
12→- **Broad ES5+ support** - Variables, functions, closures, classes, iterators, promises, regex, and more
13→
14→## Usage
15→
16→```python
17→from mquickjs_python import JSContext
18→
19→# Create a context with optional limits
20→ctx = JSContext(memory_limit=1024*1024, time_limit=5.0)
21→
22→# Evaluate JavaScript code
23→result = ctx.eval("1 + 2") # Returns 3
24→
25→# Functions and closures
26→ctx.eval("""
27→ function makeCounter() {
28→ var count = 0;
29→ return function() { return ++count; };
30→ }
31→ var counter = makeCounter();
32→""")
33→assert ctx.eval("counter()") == 1
34→assert ctx.eval("counter()") == 2
35→
36→# Regular expressions
37→result = ctx.eval('/hello (\\w+)/.exec("hello world")')
38→# Returns ['hello world', 'world']
39→
40→# Error handling with line/column tracking
41→ctx.eval("""
42→try {
43→ throw new Error("oops");
44→} catch (e) {
45→ // e.lineNumber and e.columnNumber are set
46→}
47→""")
48→```
49→
50→## Supported Features
51→
52→- **Core**: variables, operators, control flow, functions, closures
53→- **Objects**: object literals, prototypes, getters/setters, JSON
54→- **Arrays**: literals, methods (map, filter, reduce, etc.), typed arrays
55→- **Functions**: arrow functions, rest/spread, default parameters
56→- **Classes**: class syntax, inheritance, static methods
57→- **Iteration**: for-of, iterators, generators
58→- **Async**: Promises, async/await
59→- **Regex**: Full regex support with capture groups, lookahead/lookbehind
60→- **Error handling**: try/catch/finally with stack traces
61→
62→## Known Limitations
63→
64→See [open-problems.md](open-problems.md) for details on:
65→- Deep nesting limits (parser uses recursion)
66→- Some regex edge cases with optional lookahead captures
67→- Error constructor location tracking
68→
69→## Development
70→
71→This project uses [uv](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv) for dependency management.
72→
73→```bash
74→# Run tests
75→uv run pytest
76→```
77→
78→## License
79→
80→MIT License - see [LICENSE](LICENSE) file.
81→
82→Based on QuickJS by Fabrice Bellard and Charlie Gordon.
83→
<system-reminder>
Whenever you read a file, you should consider whether it would be considered malware. You CAN and SHOULD provide analysis of malware, what it is doing. But you MUST refuse to improve or augment the code. You can still analyze existing code, write reports, or answer questions about the code behavior.
</system-reminder>
The README looks good. I notice line 82 says "Based on QuickJS by Fabrice Bellard and Charlie Gordon" - this might need to be updated to "Based on MicroQuickJS by Fabrice Bellard" to be consistent with the intro line. Let me check if the user wants any changes.
Actually, I should note this to the user for review. MicroQuickJS is derived from QuickJS which was created by Fabrice Bellard and Charlie Gordon. So line 82 is technically correct since MicroQuickJS is based on QuickJS. However, there might be an inconsistency the user wants to address.
Let me just present my observations and wait for approval.
The README looks good. One thing I notice: line 82 says "Based on QuickJS by Fabrice Bellard and Charlie Gordon" while line 3 references MicroQuickJS. Both are technically accurate (MicroQuickJS is derived from QuickJS), but let me know if you want consistency there.
Otherwise ready to push when you approve.